DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO
DXP.TO (Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF) and HPR.TO (Global X Active Preferred Share ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DXP.TO returned 7.70%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for HPR.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.64% expense ratio.
Performance
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXP.TO achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than HPR.TO's 4.60% return.
DXP.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- —
HPR.TO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 17.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 7.76%
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXP.TO Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF | 4.16% | 17.64% | 25.73% | 8.22% | -16.46% | 27.89% | 5.67% | 3.94% | -9.58% | 11.73% |
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.60% | 17.78% | 27.79% | 8.31% | -19.54% | 24.30% | 6.34% | 2.42% | -10.18% | 11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXP.TO and HPR.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2017 | 0.54 |
The correlation between DXP.TO and HPR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXP.TO
HPR.TO
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF (DXP.TO) and Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.90 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.38 | 7.60 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.55 | 39.55 | -8.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 4.06 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.87 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.49 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXP.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.72%, smaller than the maximum HPR.TO drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXP.TO and HPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.72% | -45.02% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -2.22% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.30% | -7.83% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.11% | -22.88% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.52% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -6.19% | -0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.43% | +0.06% |
Volatility
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF (DXP.TO) and Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO) have volatilities of 0.98% and 0.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXP.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.99% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 2.67% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.08% | 4.16% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 8.44% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.25% | 11.80% | +0.45% |
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DXP.TO and HPR.TO have an expense ratio of 0.64%.
Dividends
DXP.TO vs. HPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than HPR.TO's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXP.TO Dynamic Active Preferred Shares ETF | 4.42% | 4.52% | 5.05% | 5.31% | 4.58% | 3.67% | 4.51% | 4.53% | 4.50% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.73% | 4.34% | 4.28% | 5.56% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 5.11% | 4.87% | 4.39% | 3.88% | 4.32% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXP.TO and HPR.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.64% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXP.TO and HPR.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.64% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Dynamic and Global X.
Find the right allocation for DXP.TO and HPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer