PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXNLX vs. RMQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXNLX achieves a 25.01% return, which is significantly lower than RMQAX's 39.33% return.


DXNLX

1D
-0.37%
1M
11.20%
YTD
25.01%
6M
22.75%
1Y
48.59%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
18.84%
10Y*

RMQAX

1D
-0.58%
1M
17.69%
YTD
39.33%
6M
35.20%
1Y
81.45%
3Y*
50.89%
5Y*
26.30%
10Y*
37.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
25.01%22.13%28.56%66.63%-40.88%32.49%58.90%46.34%-3.37%37.37%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
39.33%33.92%44.76%115.91%-59.93%56.36%101.06%80.80%-7.28%66.53%

Correlation

The correlation between DXNLX and RMQAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

1.00

The correlation between DXNLX and RMQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXNLX vs. RMQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXNLX
DXNLX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DXNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DXNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RMQAX
RMQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RMQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXNLXRMQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.32

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

12.01

-0.58

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXNLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the RMQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXNLX and RMQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXNLXRMQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.58

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.57

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.75

+0.11

Drawdowns

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXNLX drawdown since its inception was -43.77%, smaller than the maximum RMQAX drawdown of -63.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXNLX and RMQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXNLXRMQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.77%

-63.18%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.91%

-24.96%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.35%

-42.45%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.77%

-63.18%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-0.58%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-12.90%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

6.89%

-2.58%

Volatility

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund (DXNLX) is 5.56%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RMQAX) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that DXNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXNLXRMQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

8.60%

-3.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

24.31%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.04%

32.14%

-12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.24%

46.18%

-17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.84%

46.41%

-17.57%

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXNLX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RMQAX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXNLX vs. RMQAX - Dividend Comparison

DXNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than RMQAX's 26.03% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXNLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.25X Fund
0.80%2.31%0.17%0.00%0.00%7.43%12.20%0.00%8.79%7.52%
RMQAX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
26.03%36.27%26.02%3.76%0.00%2.18%5.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DXNLX and RMQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQAX has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to DXNLX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXNLX dropped -43.77% vs RMQAX's -63.18%.

RMQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXNLX and RMQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer