DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO
DXMO.TO (Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF) and DXW.TO (Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXMO.TO is a Materials fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXW.TO is a International Equity fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXMO.TO returned 39.70% vs 17.73% for DXW.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXMO.TO achieves a -5.46% return, which is significantly lower than DXW.TO's 10.47% return.
DXMO.TO
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -14.95%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- YTD
- -5.46%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXW.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | -5.46% | 86.60% | -9.21% |
DXW.TO Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF | 10.47% | 20.35% | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXMO.TO and DXW.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXMO.TO
DXW.TO
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) and Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF (DXW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXMO.TO | DXW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.74 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 5.89 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXMO.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum DXW.TO drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXMO.TO and DXW.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXMO.TO | DXW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -30.99% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.12% | -10.23% | -15.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.24% | -1.15% | -23.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.36% | -7.51% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 3.02% | +7.26% |
Volatility
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF (DXW.TO) at 3.75%. This indicates that DXMO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXMO.TO | DXW.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.29% | 3.75% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.72% | 12.05% | +20.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.28% | 14.35% | +24.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 14.40% | +25.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 16.81% | +23.02% |
Dividends
DXMO.TO vs. DXW.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXMO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DXW.TO Dynamic Active International Dividend ETF | 1.57% | 2.38% | 2.21% | 1.94% | 2.36% | 1.35% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXMO.TO and DXW.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXMO.TO is categorized as Materials, while DXW.TO is International Equity.
Find the right allocation for DXMO.TO and DXW.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer