PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJS vs. EZJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJS vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJS achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 28.79% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJS has outperformed EZJ with an annualized return of 17.36%, while EZJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


DXJS

1D
-0.02%
1M
2.99%
YTD
26.16%
6M
32.96%
1Y
64.97%
3Y*
34.91%
5Y*
25.18%
10Y*
17.36%

EZJ

1D
0.84%
1M
12.78%
YTD
28.79%
6M
31.91%
1Y
58.39%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJS vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
26.16%37.08%20.70%38.96%5.02%11.66%-3.22%18.24%-18.69%29.56%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
28.79%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJS and EZJ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.70

The correlation between DXJS and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

DXJS vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DXJS
EZJ

Industrials

27.6%
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

19.7%
12.2%

Basic Materials

12.0%
3.0%

Technology

11.2%
19.1%

Financial Services

9.2%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
3.6%

Healthcare

4.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

3.3%
2.3%

Communication Services

1.7%
7.9%

Utilities

1.6%
1.1%

Energy

1.0%
1.1%

Industrials

DXJS
27.6%
EZJ
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DXJS
19.7%
EZJ
12.2%

Basic Materials

DXJS
12.0%
EZJ
3.0%

Technology

DXJS
11.2%
EZJ
19.1%

Financial Services

DXJS
9.2%
EZJ
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

DXJS
8.4%
EZJ
3.6%

Healthcare

DXJS
4.4%
EZJ
6.2%

Real Estate

DXJS
3.3%
EZJ
2.3%

Communication Services

DXJS
1.7%
EZJ
7.9%

Utilities

DXJS
1.6%
EZJ
1.1%

Energy

DXJS
1.0%
EZJ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJS vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJS
DXJS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DXJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJS vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJSEZJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.27

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

2.19

+4.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.90

6.72

+17.18

DXJS vs. EZJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJS Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the EZJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJS and EZJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJSEZJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

1.48

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

0.21

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.31

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.23

+0.52

Drawdowns

DXJS vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJS drawdown since its inception was -39.30%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJS and EZJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJSEZJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.30%

-58.63%

+19.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-26.78%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-31.48%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.49%

-58.63%

+42.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-58.63%

+19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-4.25%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-21.29%

+14.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

8.72%

-5.99%

Volatility

DXJS vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund (DXJS) is 5.08%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that DXJS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJSEZJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

8.67%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.39%

30.75%

-15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.64%

39.75%

-20.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

36.59%

-18.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

34.54%

-14.83%

DXJS vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJS vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison

DXJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than EZJ's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJS
WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Fund
1.50%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.60%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXJS and EZJ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZJ has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to DXJS (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJS dropped -39.30% vs EZJ's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJS leads with 17.36% vs 10.74% for EZJ. On fees, DXJS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, DXJS has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJS has performed better with a 17.36% return vs 10.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DXJS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.50% for DXJS.

DXJS is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. DXJS tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged SmallCap Equity Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DXJS and 0.95% for EZJ.

DXJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJS and EZJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer