PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DXJP.L is traded in GBp, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJP.L achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.


DXJP.L

1D
0.62%
1M
6.69%
YTD
20.87%
6M
24.40%
1Y
56.54%
3Y*
33.50%
5Y*
25.49%
10Y*
16.93%

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DXJP.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
20.87%33.41%28.49%40.34%4.78%16.94%3.19%7.24%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJP.L and TDGB.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.53

The correlation between DXJP.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DXJP.L
TDGB.L

Industrials

28.3%
3.9%

Financial Services

19.4%
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

16.4%
3.8%

Technology

12.8%
0.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
1.2%

Healthcare

7.1%
14.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
10.1%

Energy

2.0%
19.7%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

6.2%

Industrials

DXJP.L
28.3%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Financial Services

DXJP.L
19.4%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DXJP.L
16.4%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Technology

DXJP.L
12.8%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Basic Materials

DXJP.L
7.5%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Healthcare

DXJP.L
7.1%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Communication Services

DXJP.L
4.0%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

DXJP.L
2.6%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

DXJP.L
2.0%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Real Estate

DXJP.L

-

TDGB.L
0.0%

Utilities

DXJP.L

-

TDGB.L
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJP.L
DXJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DXJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJP.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.59

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.60

6.26

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.40

20.72

-1.32

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJP.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJP.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

3.15

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.34

1.55

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.98

-0.29

Drawdowns

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJP.L drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJP.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJP.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.75%

-29.60%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-4.66%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.88%

-12.41%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.88%

-12.41%

-10.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.47%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-3.70%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

1.41%

+1.50%

Volatility

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (DXJP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that DXJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJP.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.49%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

7.01%

+8.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.06%

9.28%

+9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.04%

11.42%

+7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

14.44%

+5.00%

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJP.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

DXJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than TDGB.L's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DXJP.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
1.40%1.58%1.61%1.92%2.49%1.62%1.97%2.26%2.41%1.34%0.62%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXJP.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDGB.L is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDGB.L is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DXJP.L.

DXJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. DXJP.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Equity Index (GBP Hedged), while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DXJP.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJP.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer