DXJ vs. IXC
DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXJ returned 18.23%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for IXC. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DXJ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.
Performance
DXJ vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 30.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 18.23%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 17.86%
- 6M
- 21.01%
- 1Y
- 51.36%
- 3Y*
- 31.77%
- 5Y*
- 25.93%
- 10Y*
- 18.23%
IXC
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 6M
- 30.15%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
DXJ vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 17.86% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -19.78% | 22.81% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 30.67% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXJ and IXC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DXJ and IXC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DXJ vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXJ
IXC
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
DXJ
IXC
-
Financial Services
DXJ
IXC
-
Consumer Cyclical
DXJ
IXC
-
Technology
DXJ
IXC
-
Basic Materials
DXJ
IXC
-
Healthcare
DXJ
IXC
-
Consumer Defensive
DXJ
IXC
-
Communication Services
DXJ
IXC
-
Energy
DXJ
IXC
Utilities
DXJ
IXC
-
Real Estate
DXJ
-
IXC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXJ vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
DXJ
IXC
DXJ vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXJ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.41 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 4.82 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | 14.26 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXJ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.48 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.37 | 0.83 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.38 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.32 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
DXJ vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXJ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.63% | -67.88% | +18.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -9.66% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.19% | -19.06% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.19% | -24.93% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.14% | -64.16% | +25.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -5.96% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -17.47% | +3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 3.26% | -0.45% |
Volatility
DXJ vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 4.19%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXJ | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 6.55% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 15.51% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 18.79% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 23.52% | -4.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 26.85% | -6.66% |
DXJ vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXJ vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IXC's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.10% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.82% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXJ and IXC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to DXJ (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs IXC's -67.88%.
On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.23% vs 10.03% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.10% for DXJ.
DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.46% for IXC.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXJ and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer