PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJ vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DXJ vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 30.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 18.23%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.03% annualized return.


DXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.86%
6M
21.01%
1Y
51.36%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
25.93%
10Y*
18.23%

IXC

1D
1.00%
1M
3.26%
YTD
30.67%
6M
30.15%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
19.39%
10Y*
10.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXJ vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
17.86%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
30.67%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DXJ and IXC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between DXJ and IXC has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DXJ vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DXJ
IXC

Industrials

27.4%

-

Financial Services

18.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%

-

Technology

12.9%

-

Basic Materials

8.5%

-

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Communication Services

2.7%

-

Energy

1.7%
100.0%

Utilities

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

DXJ
27.4%
IXC

-

Financial Services

DXJ
18.3%
IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

DXJ
15.6%
IXC

-

Technology

DXJ
12.9%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

DXJ
8.5%
IXC

-

Healthcare

DXJ
6.8%
IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

DXJ
4.7%
IXC

-

Communication Services

DXJ
2.7%
IXC

-

Energy

DXJ
1.7%
IXC
100.0%

Utilities

DXJ
0.1%
IXC

-

Real Estate

DXJ

-

IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXJ vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJ vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.41

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

4.82

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.34

14.26

+4.08

DXJ vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJ and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJIXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.48

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.37

0.83

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.38

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Drawdowns

DXJ vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.63%

-67.88%

+18.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-9.66%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.19%

-19.06%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-24.93%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

-64.16%

+25.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.06%

-5.96%

+3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.33%

-17.47%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

3.26%

-0.45%

Volatility

DXJ vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 4.19%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXJIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

6.55%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

15.51%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

18.79%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

23.52%

-4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.19%

26.85%

-6.66%

DXJ vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

DXJ vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IXC's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.10%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.82%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


DXJ and IXC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to DXJ (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXJ dropped -49.63% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.23% vs 10.03% for IXC. On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 10.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.10% for DXJ.

DXJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global Energy Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DXJ and 0.46% for IXC.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXJ and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer