PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXJ vs. CJP.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
12.49%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
8.15%36.93%16.73%38.10%-3.26%19.06%2.18%18.77%-23.77%29.71%
Different Trading Currencies

DXJ is traded in USD, while CJP.NEO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CJP.NEO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXJ achieves a 12.49% return, which is significantly higher than CJP.NEO's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DXJ has outperformed CJP.NEO with an annualized return of 17.51%, while CJP.NEO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.36% annualized return.


DXJ

1D
2.26%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
12.49%
6M
28.11%
1Y
50.78%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
24.88%
10Y*
17.51%

CJP.NEO

1D
2.46%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
8.15%
6M
22.56%
1Y
48.48%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
14.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DXJ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than CJP.NEO's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CJP.NEO
CJP.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJP.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) and iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXJCJP.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.22

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.91

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

3.57

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.24

14.30

+0.95

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the CJP.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXJ and CJP.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXJCJP.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.22

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.32

0.90

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.63

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.40

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between DXJ and CJP.NEO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Dividend Comparison

DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than CJP.NEO's 1.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.15%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
CJP.NEO
iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
1.35%1.48%1.71%1.24%1.96%1.56%1.97%2.42%2.38%1.48%0.97%0.84%

Drawdowns

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.63%, which is greater than CJP.NEO's maximum drawdown of -45.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXJ and CJP.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DXJCJP.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.63%

-38.36%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-13.45%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

-20.86%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

-37.75%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-5.16%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.44%

-11.25%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.43%

-0.18%

Volatility

DXJ vs. CJP.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) is 7.27%, while iShares Japan Fundamental Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CJP.NEO) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that DXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJP.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DXJCJP.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

8.23%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.82%

15.25%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.85%

21.92%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

20.84%

-1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

22.82%

-2.31%