DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO
DXG.TO (Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF) and DXQ.TO (Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXG.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXQ.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DXG.TO returned 31.35%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for DXQ.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXG.TO achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly higher than DXQ.TO's 8.37% return.
DXG.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 31.35%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
DXQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 16.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 19.78% | 13.33% | 55.25% | 10.41% | 5.83% |
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 8.37% | 12.99% | 21.07% | 20.08% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXG.TO and DXQ.TO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between DXG.TO and DXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXG.TO
DXQ.TO
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO) and Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXG.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 3.16 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 8.70 | -0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXG.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.03%, which is greater than DXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXG.TO and DXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXG.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -15.54% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -5.11% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.90% | -15.54% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -0.95% | -5.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -1.25% | -4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.85% | +1.50% |
Volatility
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF (DXQ.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that DXG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXG.TO | DXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 2.47% | +5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.75% | 7.57% | +11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 9.29% | +12.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 10.86% | +8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 10.86% | +8.64% |
Dividends
DXG.TO vs. DXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
DXG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.23% | 0.50% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
DXQ.TO Dynamic Active Enhanced Yield Covered Options ETF | 7.82% | 7.45% | 5.74% | 6.54% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXG.TO and DXQ.TO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXG.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while DXQ.TO is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for DXG.TO and DXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer