DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO
DXG.TO (Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF) and DXMO.TO (Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXG.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Dynamic, while DXMO.TO is a Materials fund actively managed by Dynamic. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DXG.TO returned 25.99% vs 47.50% for DXMO.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXG.TO achieves a 19.78% return, which is significantly higher than DXMO.TO's 0.49% return.
DXG.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- YTD
- 19.78%
- 1Y
- 25.99%
- 3Y*
- 31.35%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
DXMO.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -10.89%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 47.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 19.78% | 13.33% | 21.46% |
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.49% | 86.60% | -9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXG.TO and DXMO.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2024 | 0.34 |
The correlation between DXG.TO and DXMO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DXG.TO
DXMO.TO
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO) and Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXG.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.92 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 4.88 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXG.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.03%, roughly equal to the maximum DXMO.TO drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXG.TO and DXMO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXG.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -26.12% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -26.12% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.49% | -19.47% | +12.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -6.28% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 10.06% | -6.71% |
Volatility
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF (DXG.TO) is 7.65%, while Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF (DXMO.TO) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that DXG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXMO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXG.TO | DXMO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 10.43% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.75% | 32.29% | -13.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.71% | 38.87% | -17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 39.69% | -20.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.50% | 39.69% | -20.19% |
Dividends
DXG.TO vs. DXMO.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DXG.TO nor DXMO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXG.TO Dynamic Active Global Dividend ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.23% | 0.50% | 0.17% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
DXMO.TO Dynamic Active Mining Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXG.TO and DXMO.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXG.TO is categorized as Global Equity Income, while DXMO.TO is Materials.
Find the right allocation for DXG.TO and DXMO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer