PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DXC vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DXC vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DXC Technology Company (DXC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DXC achieves a -37.54% return, which is significantly lower than IBM's 4.53% return.


DXC

1D
-8.50%
1M
-20.37%
YTD
-37.54%
6M
-33.21%
1Y
-39.28%
3Y*
-29.12%
5Y*
-25.51%
10Y*

IBM

1D
-7.17%
1M
34.16%
YTD
4.53%
6M
2.32%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
36.49%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DXC vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXC
DXC Technology Company
-37.54%-26.68%-12.64%-13.70%-17.68%25.01%-30.14%-27.90%-34.63%53.75%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
4.53%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between DXC and IBM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DXC:

$1.54B

IBM:

$290.99B

EPS

DXC:

$0.10

IBM:

$11.32

PE Ratio

DXC:

90.56

IBM:

27.00

PEG Ratio

DXC:

2.39

IBM:

0.32

PS Ratio

DXC:

0.13

IBM:

4.21

PB Ratio

DXC:

0.48

IBM:

8.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

DXC:

$12.64B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DXC:

$1.73B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

DXC:

$1.70B

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DXC vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DXC
DXC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DXC vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DXC Technology Company (DXC) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DXCIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.13

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

0.59

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.97

1.29

-3.25

DXC vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DXC Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DXC and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DXCIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

0.47

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

0.80

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.33

0.30

-0.63

Drawdowns

DXC vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DXC drawdown since its inception was -91.10%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXC and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DXCIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.10%

-69.40%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-30.96%

-18.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.15%

-30.96%

-40.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.07%

-30.96%

-50.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.10%

-7.17%

-82.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.04%

-20.12%

-37.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.00%

14.16%

+5.84%

Volatility

DXC vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

DXC Technology Company (DXC) has a higher volatility of 31.94% compared to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) at 20.58%. This indicates that DXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DXCIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.94%

20.58%

+11.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.83%

34.08%

+11.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.29%

38.99%

+13.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.27%

27.03%

+19.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.58%

26.51%

+25.07%

Dividends

DXC vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

DXC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXC
DXC Technology Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.82%2.18%24.81%0.72%0.00%0.00%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.20%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Financials

DXC vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DXC Technology Company and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.13B
15.92B
(DXC) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DXC vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DXC Technology Company and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
56.2%
Portfolio components
DXC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DXC Technology Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

DXC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DXC Technology Company reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

DXC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DXC Technology Company reported a net income of -141.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of -4.5%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DXC and IBM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXC has higher volatility (31.94%) compared to IBM (20.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXC dropped -91.10% vs IBM's -69.40%.

IBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DXC and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer