DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE
DX2E.DE (Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DX2E.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DX2E.DE returned 7.54%/yr vs 8.35%/yr for XDWH.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DX2E.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DX2E.DE achieves a 13.27% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, DX2E.DE has underperformed XDWH.DE with an annualized return of 7.54%, while XDWH.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.35% annualized return.
DX2E.DE
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- YTD
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.54%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DX2E.DE Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 13.27% | 7.67% | 20.50% | 1.50% | 5.79% | 19.36% | -15.20% | 28.45% | -6.70% | 4.17% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 6.77% | 2.20% | 7.45% | 0.04% | 0.11% | 30.30% | 2.70% | 27.21% | 5.98% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DX2E.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DX2E.DE and XDWH.DE has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DX2E.DE
XDWH.DE
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DX2E.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 2.24 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 5.74 | +4.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DX2E.DE drawdown since its inception was -63.84%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DX2E.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DX2E.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -40.65% | -23.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.79% | -9.82% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.59% | -21.11% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.57% | -21.11% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.15% | -26.06% | -16.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.35% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.85% | -7.34% | -11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 3.83% | -1.91% |
Volatility
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P Global Infrastructure Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2E.DE) is 3.27%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that DX2E.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DX2E.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 4.52% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.89% | 10.23% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.91% | 14.17% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.23% | 13.51% | -1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 15.62% | -0.87% |
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DX2E.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DX2E.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DX2E.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DX2E.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DX2E.DE.
DX2E.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. DX2E.DE tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Net Total Return Index, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DX2E.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DX2E.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer