PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers LPX Private Equity Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2D.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DX2D.DE achieves a -15.03% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.DE's 19.10% return.


DX2D.DE

1D
-0.28%
1M
2.67%
6M
-14.96%
YTD
-15.03%
1Y
-17.90%
3Y*
7.36%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
10.70%

XNAS.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.01%
6M
20.42%
YTD
19.10%
1Y
33.14%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
16.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DX2D.DE
Xtrackers LPX Private Equity Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
-15.03%-10.95%31.41%40.37%-29.92%58.49%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
19.10%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%31.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.66

The correlation between DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DX2D.DE
DX2D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DX2D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DX2D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DX2D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DX2D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
DX2D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers LPX Private Equity Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2D.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DX2D.DEXNAS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.35

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

3.33

-3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

9.64

-10.80

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DX2D.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DX2D.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.50%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DX2D.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.50%

-31.25%

-45.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.39%

-10.00%

-17.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.34%

-26.72%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.85%

-31.25%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.56%

-2.56%

-28.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-7.75%

-8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.43%

3.45%

+11.98%

Volatility

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers LPX Private Equity Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (DX2D.DE) is 5.46%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that DX2D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DX2D.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

6.66%

-1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

12.34%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

16.97%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

20.06%

+3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

19.92%

+3.10%

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DX2D.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DX2D.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DX2D.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DX2D.DE.

DX2D.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XNAS.DE is Nasdaq-100. DX2D.DE tracks LPX Major Market Index, while XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DX2D.DE and 0.20% for XNAS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DX2D.DE and XNAS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer