PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWTFX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWTFX achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than CRDBX's 20.55% return.


DWTFX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.17%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.63%
1Y
33.09%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
9.13%

CRDBX

1D
1.73%
1M
4.60%
YTD
20.55%
6M
19.60%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
9.74%27.93%12.86%-0.79%2.23%12.69%18.35%
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
20.55%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.21%28.08%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DWTFX and CRDBX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020

0.48

The correlation between DWTFX and CRDBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWTFX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWTFX
DWTFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DWTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DWTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) and Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWTFXCRDBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.66

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

6.32

-4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

20.49

-14.64

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWTFX and CRDBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWTFX drawdown since its inception was -46.24%, which is greater than CRDBX's maximum drawdown of -28.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWTFX and CRDBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.24%

-28.12%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-7.13%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-17.77%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-28.12%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

-1.33%

-4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-6.53%

-2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.56%

2.19%

+3.37%

Volatility

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) is 5.65%, while Potomac Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that DWTFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

6.17%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.17%

11.94%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

15.24%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

19.87%

-3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

20.41%

-3.87%

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWTFX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

DWTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, less than CRDBX's 12.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDBX
Potomac Defensive Bull Fund
12.74%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
9.66%10.60%0.00%1.33%7.27%22.92%7.11%7.00%3.78%9.52%3.06%6.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWTFX and CRDBX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDBX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to DWTFX (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWTFX dropped -46.24% vs CRDBX's -28.12%.

CRDBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWTFX and CRDBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer