PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWTFX vs. CRDBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
-2.19%27.93%12.86%-0.79%2.23%12.69%18.22%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
-2.90%25.36%19.91%18.44%-8.22%28.08%24.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWTFX achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly higher than CRDBX's -2.90% return.


DWTFX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-12.61%
YTD
-2.19%
6M
7.06%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
8.09%

CRDBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
3.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
13.23%
5Y*
11.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWTFX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CRDBX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWTFX vs. CRDBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWTFX
DWTFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DWTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DWTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDBX
CRDBX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CRDBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) and Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.50

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

2.79

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

4.28

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.29

13.76

-8.47

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWTFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the CRDBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWTFX and CRDBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.50

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.01

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.01

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between DWTFX and CRDBX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Dividend Comparison

DWTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%, less than CRDBX's 15.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWTFX
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund
10.84%10.60%0.00%1.33%7.27%22.92%7.11%7.00%3.78%9.52%3.06%6.27%
CRDBX
Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund
15.82%15.36%12.58%9.91%0.18%25.05%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWTFX drawdown since its inception was -46.24%, smaller than the maximum CRDBX drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWTFX and CRDBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.24%

-97.00%

+50.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.49%

-7.13%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-97.00%

+77.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.49%

-95.91%

+79.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-25.62%

+16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

2.22%

+2.19%

Volatility

DWTFX vs. CRDBX - Volatility Comparison

Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro Fund (DWTFX) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Conquer Risk Defensive Bull Fund (CRDBX) at 2.03%. This indicates that DWTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWTFXCRDBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

2.03%

+4.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.62%

9.57%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.08%

20.50%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

1,635.86%

-1,620.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

1,526.35%

-1,510.09%