DWSH vs. QQQD
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and QQQD (Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. DWSH is actively managed, while QQQD is passively managed. Over the past year, DWSH returned -6.37% vs -16.16% for QQQD. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for QQQD.
Performance
DWSH vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -1.49% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- -6.37%
- 3Y*
- -2.81%
- 5Y*
- -2.43%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 1Y
- -16.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | -4.04% | -2.57% | 2.49% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | -1.49% | -20.32% | -27.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and QQQD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
QQQD
DWSH vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWSH | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.89 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.74 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | -1.27 | +0.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and QQQD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.55% | -49.47% | -34.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -21.94% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.16% | -46.74% | -35.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.82% | -30.96% | -32.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.50% | 12.97% | -4.47% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.75%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | QQQD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | 7.75% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.82% | 16.58% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.31% | 21.34% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.36% | 26.81% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.24% | 26.81% | +4.43% |
DWSH vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than QQQD's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.58% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
QQQD Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares | 3.12% | 4.33% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and QQQD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to QQQD (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.55% vs QQQD's -49.47%.
On 1-year performance, DWSH leads with -6.37% vs -16.16% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -6.37% return vs -16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 3.12% for QQQD.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.57% for QQQD.
DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and QQQD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer