PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWSH vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWSH vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's -1.49% return.


DWSH

1D
1.79%
1M
-2.21%
6M
0.73%
YTD
-4.04%
1Y
-6.37%
3Y*
-2.81%
5Y*
-2.43%
10Y*

QQQD

1D
-0.63%
1M
-3.78%
6M
-1.61%
YTD
-1.49%
1Y
-16.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
-4.04%-2.57%2.49%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
-1.49%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and QQQD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWSH vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWSHQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.89

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

-0.74

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

-1.27

+0.52

DWSH vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWSHQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.55%

-49.47%

-34.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.88%

-21.94%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.16%

-46.74%

-35.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.82%

-30.96%

-32.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.50%

12.97%

-4.47%

Volatility

DWSH vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) at 7.75%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWSHQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

7.75%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.82%

16.58%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.31%

21.34%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.36%

26.81%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.24%

26.81%

+4.43%

DWSH vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWSH vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than QQQD's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.58%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
3.12%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWSH and QQQD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWSH has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to QQQD (7.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.55% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, DWSH leads with -6.37% vs -16.16% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, QQQD has been the lower-risk option at 7.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -6.37% return vs -16.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 3.12% for QQQD.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.57% for QQQD.

DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWSH and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer