PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWSH vs. QQQD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWSH vs. QQQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than QQQD's 5.92% return.


DWSH

1D
-2.09%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.96%
1Y
-7.85%
3Y*
-4.46%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*

QQQD

1D
0.97%
1M
10.75%
YTD
5.92%
6M
8.00%
1Y
-12.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. QQQD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
0.50%-2.57%2.49%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
5.92%-20.32%-27.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and QQQD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWSH vs. QQQD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH
DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQD
QQQD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QQQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. QQQD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWSHQQQDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.91

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.56

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-0.89

+0.02

DWSH vs. QQQD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is higher than the QQQD Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and QQQD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. QQQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than QQQD's maximum drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and QQQD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWSHQQQDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.73%

-49.47%

-33.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-22.72%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.32%

-42.73%

-38.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.70%

-30.65%

-33.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.10%

14.48%

-5.38%

Volatility

DWSH vs. QQQD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 6.86%, while Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares (QQQD) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWSHQQQDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

7.24%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

15.69%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.03%

20.86%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

26.85%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.15%

26.85%

+4.30%

DWSH vs. QQQD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWSH vs. QQQD - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than QQQD's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DWSH
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF
6.28%6.31%6.17%10.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.12%
QQQD
Direxion Daily Magnificent 7 Bear 1X Shares
2.90%4.33%5.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWSH and QQQD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQD has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to DWSH (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs QQQD's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, DWSH leads with -7.85% vs -12.65% for QQQD. On fees, QQQD is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, DWSH has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DWSH has performed better with a -7.85% return vs -12.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQD is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 2.90% for QQQD.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.57% for QQQD.

DWSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWSH and QQQD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer