DWSH vs. JAAA
DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -1.61%/yr vs 4.79%/yr for JAAA. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for JAAA.
Performance
DWSH vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 1.87% return.
DWSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- -4.14%
- 5Y*
- -1.61%
- 10Y*
- —
JAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 4.79%
- 10Y*
- —
DWSH vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 0.85% | -2.57% | 5.98% | -22.04% | 17.45% | -25.74% | -35.41% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 1.87% | 5.16% | 7.43% | 8.59% | 0.49% | 1.39% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWSH and JAAA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWSH vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank
DWSH
JAAA
DWSH vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DWSH | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | 5.98 | -6.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | 10.04 | -10.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 2.69 | -1.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 13.07 | -13.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 70.18 | -71.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWSH | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 5.98 | -6.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 2.87 | -2.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 2.77 | -3.20 |
Drawdowns
DWSH vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and JAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWSH | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.73% | -2.64% | -80.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -0.39% | -17.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.23% | -1.46% | -27.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.87% | -2.64% | -30.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.25% | -0.02% | -81.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.61% | -0.25% | -63.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 0.07% | +11.75% |
Volatility
DWSH vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWSH | JAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 0.13% | +5.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 0.64% | +13.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.19% | 0.85% | +20.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 1.68% | +24.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.22% | 1.64% | +29.58% |
DWSH vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWSH vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison
DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, more than JAAA's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF | 6.26% | 6.31% | 6.17% | 10.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.12% |
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF | 5.00% | 5.30% | 6.35% | 6.11% | 2.74% | 1.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWSH and JAAA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWSH has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -82.73% vs JAAA's -2.64%.
On 5-year performance, JAAA leads with 4.79% vs -1.61% for DWSH. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JAAA has performed better with a 4.79% return vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JAAA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.
DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.26%, compared with 5.00% for JAAA.
DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.21% for JAAA.
JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.98 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWSH and JAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer