DWSH vs. BEDZ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

DWSH (AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWSH is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while BEDZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DWSH returned -2.43%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for BEDZ. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. DWSH charges 3.67%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.

Performance

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a -4.04% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 8.58% return.

DWSH

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 0.73%
• YTD: -4.04%
• 1Y: -6.37%
• 3Y*: -2.81%
• 5Y*: -2.43%
• 10Y*: —

BEDZ

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: 5.56%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	-4.04%	-2.57%	5.98%	-22.04%	17.45%	-5.25%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	8.58%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and BEDZ is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	-0.65

The correlation between DWSH and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DWSH	BEDZ
Utilities	-1.1%	-
Energy	-1.1%	-
Basic Materials	-2.0%	-
Real Estate	-2.3%	38.6%
Communication Services	-6.6%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	-9.5%	-
Financial Services	-13.5%	-
Healthcare	-13.7%	-
Industrials	-15.8%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-21.8%	53.0%
Technology	-32.6%	-

Return for Risk

DWSH vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH

DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 6
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 6

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 19
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 17
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.48	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.25	0.86	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.10	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	0.81	-1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.75	1.88	-2.63

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and BEDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -83.55%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.55%	-29.70%	-53.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.88%	-12.06%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.61%	-28.31%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.09%	-29.70%	-6.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.16%	-4.12%	-78.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.82%	-7.94%	-55.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.50%	5.17%	+3.33%

Volatility

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) at 4.65%. This indicates that DWSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.00%	4.65%	+6.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.82%	15.39%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.31%	20.15%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	24.76%	+1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.24%	24.70%	+6.54%

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than BEDZ's 2.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.13%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	6.58%	6.31%	6.17%	10.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DWSH and BEDZ in my portfolio?

DWSH and BEDZ have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DWSH or BEDZ?

DWSH has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to BEDZ (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWSH dropped -83.55% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.

Which ETF is better, DWSH or BEDZ?

On 5-year performance, BEDZ leads with 10.43% vs -2.43% for DWSH. On fees, BEDZ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DWSH or BEDZ?

Over the 5-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 10.43% return vs -2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DWSH or BEDZ?

BEDZ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.67% for DWSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DWSH or BEDZ?

DWSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.58%, compared with 2.13% for BEDZ.

What is the main difference between DWSH and BEDZ?

DWSH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BEDZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.67% for DWSH and 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.