DWSH vs. BEDZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ).

DWSH and BEDZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DWSH is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Jul 10, 2018. BEDZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 21, 2021.

Performance

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	2.10%	-2.57%	5.98%	-22.04%	17.45%	-4.83%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	-6.46%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	6.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWSH achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than BEDZ's -6.46% return.

DWSH

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.78%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: -6.76%
• 3Y*: -3.33%
• 5Y*: -2.29%
• 10Y*: —

BEDZ

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -4.41%
• YTD: -6.46%
• 6M: -4.76%
• 1Y: 10.13%
• 3Y*: 9.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWSH has a 3.67% expense ratio, which is higher than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

DWSH

AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF

BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

Return for Risk

DWSH vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWSH

DWSH Risk / Return Rank: 8
DWSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
DWSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DWSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DWSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
DWSH Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.40	-0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	0.77	-0.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.10	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	0.69	-0.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.32	1.90	-2.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWSH and BEDZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	0.40	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	0.22	-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between DWSH and BEDZ is -0.66. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

DWSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than BEDZ's 2.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DWSH AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF	6.18%	6.31%	6.17%	10.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.14%	0.12%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.47%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWSH drawdown since its inception was -82.73%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWSH and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.73%	-29.70%	-53.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.23%	-15.24%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.02%	-9.90%	-71.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.21%	-8.25%	-54.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.82%	5.53%	+16.29%

Volatility

DWSH vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF (DWSH) is 5.19%, while AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that DWSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DWSH	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	6.59%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	15.40%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.77%	25.68%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.72%	24.97%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.42%	24.97%	+6.45%