PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWGAX vs. BEMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWGAX achieves a 22.10% return, which is significantly lower than BEMIX's 25.80% return. Over the past 10 years, DWGAX has underperformed BEMIX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while BEMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


DWGAX

1D
1.01%
1M
7.55%
YTD
22.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
46.56%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
8.41%

BEMIX

1D
0.79%
1M
7.59%
YTD
25.80%
6M
27.44%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWGAX
American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund
22.10%34.25%3.57%11.28%-23.47%0.50%12.07%23.50%-14.90%27.69%
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
25.80%47.83%4.01%22.53%-15.91%1.68%-6.17%18.60%-15.56%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between DWGAX and BEMIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.87

The correlation between DWGAX and BEMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWGAX vs. BEMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWGAX
DWGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DWGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DWGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BEMIX
BEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) and Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DWGAXBEMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.72

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

5.10

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.72

21.30

-7.58

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWGAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the BEMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWGAX and BEMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWGAXBEMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

3.70

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.79

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.60

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.31

+0.05

Drawdowns

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum BEMIX drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWGAX and BEMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWGAXBEMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-46.05%

+7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.26%

-12.07%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-16.08%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.35%

-36.37%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-46.05%

+7.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.92%

-14.18%

+0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.89%

+0.56%

Volatility

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund (DWGAX) is 6.27%, while Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that DWGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWGAXBEMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

6.65%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

14.22%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

16.66%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

16.55%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

17.09%

-0.62%

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWGAX vs. BEMIX - Dividend Comparison

DWGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than BEMIX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMIX
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund
1.71%2.15%3.04%2.45%2.86%2.31%1.31%2.56%1.55%1.41%2.20%1.54%
DWGAX
American Funds Developing World Growth and Income Fund
1.64%1.87%1.12%1.63%1.09%1.01%1.46%1.81%2.28%2.02%2.01%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWGAX and BEMIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEMIX has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DWGAX (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWGAX dropped -38.71% vs BEMIX's -46.05%.

BEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWGAX and BEMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer