PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAT vs. XRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAT vs. XRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRLX

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.47%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.12%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAT vs. XRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


DWAT vs. XRLX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAT
XRLX

Financial Services

27.2%
12.1%

Industrials

25.1%
7.1%

Technology

10.2%
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
4.9%

Utilities

5.3%
3.2%

Healthcare

5.3%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.0%

Real Estate

5.1%
1.4%

Energy

4.2%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
11.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.7%

Financial Services

DWAT
27.2%
XRLX
12.1%

Industrials

DWAT
25.1%
XRLX
7.1%

Technology

DWAT
10.2%
XRLX
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

DWAT
6.5%
XRLX
4.9%

Utilities

DWAT
5.3%
XRLX
3.2%

Healthcare

DWAT
5.3%
XRLX
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAT
5.2%
XRLX
10.0%

Real Estate

DWAT
5.1%
XRLX
1.4%

Energy

DWAT
4.2%
XRLX
3.3%

Communication Services

DWAT
3.4%
XRLX
11.9%

Basic Materials

DWAT
2.6%
XRLX
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAT vs. XRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAT

XRLX
XRLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAT vs. XRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and FundX Conservative ETF (XRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DWAT vs. XRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWATXRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

Drawdowns

DWAT vs. XRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum XRLX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and XRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWATXRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-15.33%

+15.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.47%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.70%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

Volatility

DWAT vs. XRLX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWATXRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

8.10%

-8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.05%

-11.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.05%

-11.05%

DWAT vs. XRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAT has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than XRLX's 1.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAT vs. XRLX - Dividend Comparison

DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRLX
FundX Conservative ETF
2.57%2.77%1.66%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, XRLX is cheaper at 1.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRLX is cheaper with a 1.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

XRLX has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and FundX. Their fees differ too: 1.83% for DWAT and 1.63% for XRLX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAT and XRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer