PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAT vs. TDSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAT vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDSC

1D
-0.14%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.93%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAT vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


DWAT vs. TDSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAT
TDSC

Financial Services

27.2%
3.9%

Industrials

25.1%
2.0%

Technology

10.2%
28.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
3.4%

Utilities

5.3%
15.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
4.3%

Real Estate

5.1%
0.1%

Energy

4.2%
17.6%

Communication Services

3.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

DWAT
27.2%
TDSC
3.9%

Industrials

DWAT
25.1%
TDSC
2.0%

Technology

DWAT
10.2%
TDSC
28.5%

Consumer Defensive

DWAT
6.5%
TDSC
3.4%

Utilities

DWAT
5.3%
TDSC
15.0%

Healthcare

DWAT
5.3%
TDSC
19.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAT
5.2%
TDSC
4.3%

Real Estate

DWAT
5.1%
TDSC
0.1%

Energy

DWAT
4.2%
TDSC
17.6%

Communication Services

DWAT
3.4%
TDSC
4.7%

Basic Materials

DWAT
2.6%
TDSC
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAT vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAT

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAT vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DWAT vs. TDSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWATTDSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

Drawdowns

DWAT vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and TDSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWATTDSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-21.51%

+21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.14%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.38%

+9.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

DWAT vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWATTDSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

8.90%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.28%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.22%

-10.22%

DWAT vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAT has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAT vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison

DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.01%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.83% for DWAT and 0.69% for TDSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAT and TDSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer