DWAT vs. TDSC
DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) and TDSC (Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. DWAT charges 1.83%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TDSC.
Performance
DWAT vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDSC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 19.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 6.70% |
DWAT vs. TDSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAT
TDSC
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Financial Services
DWAT
TDSC
Industrials
DWAT
TDSC
Technology
DWAT
TDSC
Consumer Defensive
DWAT
TDSC
Utilities
DWAT
TDSC
Healthcare
DWAT
TDSC
Consumer Cyclical
DWAT
TDSC
Real Estate
DWAT
TDSC
Energy
DWAT
TDSC
Communication Services
DWAT
TDSC
Basic Materials
DWAT
TDSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAT vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank
DWAT
TDSC
DWAT vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAT | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.41 | — |
Drawdowns
DWAT vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TDSC drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and TDSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAT | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -21.51% | +21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.14% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -9.38% | +9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.37% | — |
Volatility
DWAT vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAT | TDSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 8.90% | -8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.28% | -10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 10.22% | -10.22% |
DWAT vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAT has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAT vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison
DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDSC Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF | 2.01% | 2.92% | 2.06% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TDSC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TDSC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
TDSC has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 1.83% for DWAT and 0.69% for TDSC.
Find the right allocation for DWAT and TDSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer