DWAT vs. PSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX).
DWAT and PSCX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DWAT is an actively managed fund by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014. PSCX is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Dec 22, 2020.
Performance
DWAT vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DWAT vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical ETF | 0.00% |
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF | -2.37% |
Returns By Period
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCX
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DWAT vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAT has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DWAT vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank
DWAT
PSCX
DWAT vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DWAT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.10 | — |
Dividends
DWAT vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison
Neither DWAT nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DWAT vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and PSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -10.20% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.84% | +2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.92% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility
DWAT vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DWAT | PSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 8.83% | -8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 7.06% | -7.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 7.02% | -7.02% |