PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAT vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DWAT vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DWAT vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
1.43%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
0.91%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DWAT vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAT has a 1.66% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DWAT vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAT

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAT vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DWAT vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWATPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

Dividends

DWAT vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither DWAT nor PSCX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DWAT vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and PSCX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DWATPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-10.20%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.84%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.92%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

Volatility

DWAT vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DWATPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

8.83%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.06%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

7.02%

-7.02%