PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAT vs. ELM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAT vs. ELM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ELM

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.88%
YTD
7.56%
6M
8.51%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAT vs. ELM - Yearly Performance Comparison


DWAT vs. ELM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAT
ELM

Financial Services

27.2%
18.3%

Industrials

25.1%
12.6%

Technology

10.2%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
5.2%

Utilities

5.3%
3.0%

Healthcare

5.3%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
9.1%

Real Estate

5.1%
4.7%

Energy

4.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.4%
6.6%

Basic Materials

2.6%
5.4%

Financial Services

DWAT
27.2%
ELM
18.3%

Industrials

DWAT
25.1%
ELM
12.6%

Technology

DWAT
10.2%
ELM
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

DWAT
6.5%
ELM
5.2%

Utilities

DWAT
5.3%
ELM
3.0%

Healthcare

DWAT
5.3%
ELM
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAT
5.2%
ELM
9.1%

Real Estate

DWAT
5.1%
ELM
4.7%

Energy

DWAT
4.2%
ELM
4.8%

Communication Services

DWAT
3.4%
ELM
6.6%

Basic Materials

DWAT
2.6%
ELM
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAT vs. ELM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAT

ELM
ELM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ELM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ELM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAT vs. ELM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT) and Elm Market Navigator ETF (ELM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DWAT vs. ELM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DWATELMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

Drawdowns

DWAT vs. ELM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAT drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ELM drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAT and ELM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWATELMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-9.02%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

Volatility

DWAT vs. ELM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWATELMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

9.38%

-9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.27%

-10.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

10.27%

-10.27%

DWAT vs. ELM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAT has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than ELM's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAT vs. ELM - Dividend Comparison

DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%.


PositionTTM2025
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF
0.00%0.00%
ELM
Elm Market Navigator ETF
2.52%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ELM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ELM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.

ELM has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.

They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and Elm. Their fees differ too: 1.83% for DWAT and 0.24% for ELM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAT and ELM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer