DVXB vs. REMX
DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVXB is a Materials fund tracking the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVXB charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.
Performance
DVXB vs. REMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVXB achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than REMX's 3.18% return.
DVXB
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -20.14%
- 6M
- -14.15%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 67.59%
- 3Y*
- -2.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.60%
DVXB vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 15.59% | -6.27% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 3.18% | 41.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVXB and REMX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVXB vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REMX
DVXB vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DVXB | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DVXB vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVXB drawdown since its inception was -19.77%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVXB and REMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVXB | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.77% | -90.20% | +70.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -61.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.42% | -65.08% | +52.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -66.80% | +59.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.30% | — |
Volatility
DVXB vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVXB | REMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.57% | 49.55% | -18.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 40.65% | -10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.57% | 37.19% | -6.62% |
DVXB vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVXB has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVXB vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison
DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.71% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVXB and REMX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
DVXB is categorized as Materials, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVXB and 0.59% for REMX.
Find the right allocation for DVXB and REMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer