DVSMX vs. SSCPX
DVSMX (Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund) and SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DVSMX returned 8.73%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for SSCPX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVSMX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for SSCPX.
Performance
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVSMX achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than SSCPX's 21.31% return.
DVSMX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 19.46%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 53.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SSCPX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 21.31%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.46% | 16.66% | 27.44% | 18.93% | -34.12% | 18.41% | 63.95% | 40.29% | -8.71% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 21.31% | 6.41% | 10.79% | 15.16% | -17.56% | 24.53% | 25.39% | 23.71% | -18.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between DVSMX and SSCPX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between DVSMX and SSCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DVSMX vs. SSCPX — Risk / Return Rank
DVSMX
SSCPX
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) and Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVSMX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.63 | 3.16 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.69 | 10.76 | +2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVSMX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.86 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.36 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.39 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVSMX drawdown since its inception was -47.64%, smaller than the maximum SSCPX drawdown of -53.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVSMX and SSCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVSMX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.64% | -53.65% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -11.54% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.77% | -27.78% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.64% | -27.78% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.23% | -10.25% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 3.38% | +0.68% |
Volatility
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Volatility Comparison
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund (DVSMX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) at 5.77%. This indicates that DVSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DVSMX | SSCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 5.77% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 14.57% | +5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 19.63% | +5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.83% | 22.17% | +6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.47% | 22.99% | +6.48% |
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVSMX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCPX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DVSMX vs. SSCPX - Dividend Comparison
DVSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than SSCPX's 7.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVSMX Driehaus Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.18% | 0.21% | 1.08% | 0.38% | 2.15% | 17.58% | 6.55% | 6.34% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio | 7.43% | 9.02% | 11.37% | 0.00% | 10.18% | 24.67% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 17.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 58.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DVSMX and SSCPX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVSMX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to SSCPX (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVSMX dropped -47.64% vs SSCPX's -53.65%.
DVSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DVSMX and SSCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer