DVRIX vs. MBXAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX).
DVRIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 19, 2007. MBXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 27, 2015.
Performance
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVRIX MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund | -0.42% | 10.87% | 9.66% | 9.22% | -5.10% | 3.67% | 4.66% | 13.01% | -0.39% | 6.40% |
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 7.93% | 4.13% | 13.17% | -0.91% | 7.46% | 16.62% | -0.72% | 13.59% | -2.43% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVRIX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than MBXAX's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DVRIX has underperformed MBXAX with an annualized return of 4.85%, while MBXAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.00% annualized return.
DVRIX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.70%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.85%
MBXAX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVRIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXAX's 2.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DVRIX vs. MBXAX — Risk / Return Rank
DVRIX
MBXAX
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVRIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 1.75 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.23 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.05 | 5.80 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVRIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.69 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.60 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between DVRIX and MBXAX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Dividend Comparison
DVRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVRIX MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund | 1.15% | 1.15% | 1.65% | 1.15% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.64% | 1.14% | 1.11% | 2.17% | 2.87% | 1.15% |
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.43% | 2.02% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 3.92% | 4.96% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 1.82% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVRIX drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, which is greater than MBXAX's maximum drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVRIX and MBXAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVRIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -31.75% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.45% | -11.29% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.88% | -15.66% | +5.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.80% | -31.75% | +18.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.64% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -4.11% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 2.39% | -1.58% |
Volatility
DVRIX vs. MBXAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Global Alternative Strategy Fund (DVRIX) is 1.43%, while Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that DVRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MBXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DVRIX | MBXAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 2.35% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 5.24% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 11.79% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 11.76% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.21% | 13.44% | -8.23% |