DVND vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DVND (Touchstone Dividend Select ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DVND returned 16.99%/yr vs 16.61%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DVND charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

DVND vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVND achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

DVND

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 3.87%
• YTD: 10.56%
• 6M: 11.03%
• 1Y: 24.15%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 19.19%
• 3Y*: 16.61%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVND vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF	10.56%	16.36%	11.57%	14.04%	1.22%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between DVND and FUNL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2022	0.90

The correlation between DVND and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DVND vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DVND	FUNL
Technology	23.8%	14.6%
Financial Services	14.5%	19.3%
Healthcare	11.7%	15.3%
Industrials	9.5%	11.5%
Communication Services	9.3%	5.8%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	6.5%
Energy	5.0%	7.6%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.2%
Utilities	3.3%	5.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	4.5%

Return for Risk

DVND vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVND

DVND Risk / Return Rank: 73
DVND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DVND Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
DVND Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DVND Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DVND Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 81
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVND vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DVND	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.21	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	3.29	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.48	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	5.07	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	23.58	-11.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DVND vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVND Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVND and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DVND	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.21	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.06	0.95	+0.11

Drawdowns

DVND vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVND drawdown since its inception was -14.83%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVND and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVND	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.83%	-19.35%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-3.83%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.64%	-17.37%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-3.53%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	0.82%	+1.24%

Volatility

DVND vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that DVND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVND	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.50%	0.00%	+2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.33%	5.21%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.82%	8.79%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.36%	15.15%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.36%	15.29%	-1.93%

DVND vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVND has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVND vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

DVND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DVND Touchstone Dividend Select ETF	1.80%	1.93%	2.06%	2.05%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVND and FUNL in my portfolio?

DVND and FUNL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVND or FUNL?

DVND has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVND dropped -14.83% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, DVND or FUNL?

On 3-year performance, DVND leads with 16.99% vs 16.61% for FUNL. On fees, FUNL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVND or FUNL?

Over the 3-year period, DVND has performed better with a 16.99% return vs 16.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVND or FUNL?

FUNL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DVND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVND or FUNL?

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.80% for DVND.

What is the main difference between DVND and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DVND and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DVND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.