DVMHX vs. DEEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) and Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund (DEEIX).
DVMHX is managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie. It was launched on Jun 3, 1996. DEEIX is managed by Delaware Funds by Macquarie. It was launched on Sep 14, 1998.
Performance
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | -0.91% | 4.22% | 5.10% | 5.24% | -10.69% | 3.07% | 3.95% | 8.74% | 0.79% | 5.97% |
DEEIX Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund | -1.82% | 6.26% | -1.29% | 9.21% | -26.47% | -0.70% | 15.17% | 22.02% | -7.69% | 12.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DVMHX achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than DEEIX's -1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, DVMHX has outperformed DEEIX with an annualized return of 2.30%, while DEEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.02% annualized return.
DVMHX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 3.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
DEEIX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -2.36%
- 1Y
- 2.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.23%
- 5Y*
- -2.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DVMHX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DEEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DVMHX vs. DEEIX — Risk / Return Rank
DVMHX
DEEIX
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) and Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund (DEEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DVMHX | DEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 0.38 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 0.58 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.07 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 1.65 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DVMHX | DEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 0.38 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | -0.20 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.19 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.63 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between DVMHX and DEEIX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Dividend Comparison
DVMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than DEEIX's 4.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVMHX Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 3.83% | 4.95% | 4.17% | 3.12% | 2.98% | 2.40% | 2.99% | 3.70% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.29% | 3.47% |
DEEIX Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund | 4.78% | 5.05% | 4.90% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 7.87% | 10.28% | 4.79% | 4.56% | 3.74% | 3.75% | 4.62% |
Drawdowns
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DVMHX drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum DEEIX drawdown of -34.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVMHX and DEEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DVMHX | DEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -34.48% | +18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -5.33% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.56% | -34.48% | +18.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.56% | -34.48% | +18.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.26% | -18.98% | +15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -6.37% | +4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.25% | +0.23% |
Volatility
DVMHX vs. DEEIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Delaware Minnesota High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund (DVMHX) is 1.45%, while Delaware Extended Duration Bond Fund (DEEIX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DVMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DVMHX | DEEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.45% | 3.26% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.19% | 5.02% | -2.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 8.76% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 11.61% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.65% | 10.59% | -5.94% |