PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DVLU vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DVLU vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVLU achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 35.17% return.


DVLU

1D
1.15%
1M
3.83%
YTD
10.45%
6M
8.12%
1Y
37.54%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
12.44%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
2.21%
1M
8.01%
YTD
35.17%
6M
32.77%
1Y
68.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVLU vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DVLU and FMTM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.69

The correlation between DVLU and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DVLU vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVLU
DVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVLU vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DVLUFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.47

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

5.66

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

21.64

-10.52

DVLU vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVLU and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DVLU vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVLU drawdown since its inception was -53.26%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVLU and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DVLUFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.26%

-12.12%

-41.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.24%

-12.12%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-1.90%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.17%

+0.22%

Volatility

DVLU vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF (DVLU) is 3.70%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 8.52%. This indicates that DVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DVLUFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

8.52%

-4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

18.74%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

24.04%

-7.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

23.49%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

23.49%

+2.25%

DVLU vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVLU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DVLU vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

DVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than FMTM's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DVLU
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Value ETF
0.62%0.73%1.06%1.34%2.18%1.33%1.34%1.71%0.58%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DVLU and FMTM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to DVLU (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVLU dropped -53.26% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 68.30% vs 37.54% for DVLU. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DVLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 68.30% return vs 37.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DVLU.

DVLU has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.22% for FMTM.

Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DVLU and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DVLU and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer