DVIN vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DVIN (WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVIN is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Syntax Defined Volatility XLI Index, while PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DVIN charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

DVIN vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF (DVIN) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVIN achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 44.48% return.

DVIN

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 18.87%
• 6M: 15.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRN

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 6.53%
• YTD: 44.48%
• 6M: 38.88%
• 1Y: 64.12%
• 3Y*: 36.08%
• 5Y*: 20.85%
• 10Y*: 18.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVIN vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DVIN WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF	18.87%	-1.06%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	44.48%	10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DVIN and PRN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

DVIN vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 75
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 65
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVIN vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF (DVIN) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVIN	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.67	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.55	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.91	—

Drawdowns

DVIN vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVIN drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVIN and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVIN	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.47%	-59.88%	+41.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-3.96%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.06%	-10.81%	+5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DVIN	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.15%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.42%	30.45%	-4.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.42%	25.41%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.42%	24.38%	+2.04%

DVIN vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVIN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVIN vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

DVIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DVIN WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Volatility ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVIN and PRN in my portfolio?

DVIN and PRN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DVIN or PRN?

On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVIN or PRN?

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVIN or PRN?

PRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for DVIN.

What is the main difference between DVIN and PRN?

DVIN is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. DVIN tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLI Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WEBs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for DVIN and 0.60% for PRN.