DVDN vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DVDN (Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DVDN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Kingsbarn, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DVDN returned -19.17% vs 19.10% for KEAT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DVDN charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

DVDN vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DVDN achieves a -11.52% return, which is significantly lower than KEAT's 5.02% return.

DVDN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: -11.52%
• 6M: -10.93%
• 1Y: -19.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEAT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.22%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DVDN vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	-11.52%	-17.23%	4.42%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	5.02%	22.76%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DVDN and KEAT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

DVDN vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DVDN

DVDN Risk / Return Rank: 2
DVDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DVDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DVDN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 51
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DVDN vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DVDN	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	1.79	-2.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	2.42	-3.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.32	-0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	2.04	-2.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	6.99	-8.34

DVDN vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DVDN Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DVDN and KEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DVDN vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DVDN drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -9.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DVDN and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DVDN	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-9.40%	-25.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.34%	-9.40%	-15.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.10%	-9.40%	-23.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.00%	-1.70%	-11.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.21%	2.74%	+11.47%

Volatility

DVDN vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Keating Active ETF (KEAT) at 3.48%. This indicates that DVDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DVDN	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	3.48%	+1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.57%	8.81%	+5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.83%	10.73%	+7.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.82%	10.41%	+8.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.82%	10.41%	+8.41%

DVDN vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DVDN has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DVDN vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

DVDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.07%, more than KEAT's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DVDN Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF	15.07%	17.27%	14.43%	2.74%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.34%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DVDN and KEAT in my portfolio?

DVDN and KEAT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DVDN or KEAT?

DVDN has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to KEAT (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DVDN dropped -34.59% vs KEAT's -9.40%.

Which ETF is better, DVDN or KEAT?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 19.10% vs -19.17% for DVDN. On fees, KEAT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DVDN or KEAT?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs -19.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DVDN or KEAT?

KEAT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for DVDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DVDN or KEAT?

DVDN has the higher dividend yield at 15.07%, compared with 2.34% for KEAT.

What is the main difference between DVDN and KEAT?

DVDN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Kingsbarn and Keating. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for DVDN and 0.85% for KEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.