DUST vs. UGL
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and UGL (ProShares Ultra Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while UGL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUST returned -53.65%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for UGL. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UGL.
Performance
DUST vs. UGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -26.71% return, which is significantly lower than UGL's -2.16% return. Over the past 10 years, DUST has underperformed UGL with an annualized return of -53.65%, while UGL has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.
DUST
- 1D
- 6.82%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -26.71%
- 6M
- -36.80%
- 1Y
- -76.81%
- 3Y*
- -62.09%
- 5Y*
- -47.20%
- 10Y*
- -53.65%
UGL
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 51.67%
- 3Y*
- 53.18%
- 5Y*
- 27.00%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
DUST vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -26.71% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -4.82% | -85.75% | -75.11% | -3.27% | -51.00% |
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | -2.16% | 137.57% | 46.36% | 15.56% | -7.59% | -12.30% | 39.04% | 31.11% | -8.02% | 22.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and UGL is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010 | -0.76 |
The correlation between DUST and UGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
UGL
DUST vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUST | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | 0.98 | -1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.73 | 1.43 | -3.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.21 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.38 | -2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 3.17 | -4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUST | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | 0.98 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | 0.75 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.62 | 0.57 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.39 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
DUST vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than UGL's maximum drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and UGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -75.93% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -37.56% | -48.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -37.56% | -59.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | -40.23% | -58.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -46.23% | -53.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -36.56% | -63.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.35% | -43.63% | -39.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.85% | 16.35% | +46.50% |
Volatility
DUST vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 30.34% compared to ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) at 11.03%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | UGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.34% | 11.03% | +19.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.12% | 46.81% | +25.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.34% | 52.91% | +37.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.13% | 36.18% | +35.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.19% | 32.34% | +54.85% |
DUST vs. UGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than UGL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.90%, while UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 8.90% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
UGL ProShares Ultra Gold | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and UGL have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (30.34%) compared to UGL (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs UGL's -75.93%.
On 10-year performance, UGL leads with 18.45% vs -53.65% for DUST. On fees, UGL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UGL has been the lower-risk option at 11.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGL has performed better with a 18.45% return vs -53.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 8.90%, compared with 0.00% for UGL.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGL is Leveraged Commodities. DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while UGL tracks Bloomberg Gold Subindex (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.95% for UGL.
UGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and UGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer