DUST vs. SPXS
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - DUST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUST returned -52.03%/yr vs -42.08%/yr for SPXS. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
DUST vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUST achieves a -17.98% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, DUST has underperformed SPXS with an annualized return of -52.03%, while SPXS has yielded a comparatively higher -42.08% annualized return.
DUST
- 1D
- 8.73%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -73.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.05%
- 5Y*
- -48.30%
- 10Y*
- -52.03%
SPXS
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- -20.76%
- 6M
- -18.37%
- 1Y
- -44.21%
- 3Y*
- -40.67%
- 5Y*
- -33.53%
- 10Y*
- -42.08%
DUST vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | -17.98% | -88.72% | -29.51% | -27.63% | -22.70% | -4.82% | -85.75% | -75.11% | -3.27% | -51.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -20.76% | -41.53% | -42.84% | -45.97% | 36.14% | -58.11% | -70.47% | -56.40% | 3.44% | -44.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and SPXS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, DUST and SPXS have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
SPXS
DUST vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.79 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.94 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | -1.63 | +0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | -46.94% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | -84.13% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | -90.11% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -99.63% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -96.29% | +12.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.24% | 29.25% | +35.99% |
Volatility
DUST vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) has a higher volatility of 34.13% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 14.08%. This indicates that DUST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.13% | 14.08% | +20.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.03% | 29.38% | +47.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.59% | 37.37% | +57.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 50.68% | +22.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.25% | 53.59% | +33.66% |
DUST vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than SPXS's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 7.95% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.62% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and SPXS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUST has higher volatility (34.13%) compared to SPXS (14.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUST dropped -100.00% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SPXS leads with -42.08% vs -52.03% for DUST. On fees, DUST is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 14.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXS has performed better with a -42.08% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUST is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 4.62% for SPXS.
DUST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 1.08% for SPXS.
DUST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUST and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer