DUST vs. CRMU
DUST (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares) and CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DUST tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%) while CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. DUST charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMU.
Performance
DUST vs. CRMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUST
- 1D
- 8.73%
- 1M
- 10.22%
- YTD
- -17.98%
- 6M
- -9.99%
- 1Y
- -73.95%
- 3Y*
- -62.05%
- 5Y*
- -48.30%
- 10Y*
- -52.03%
CRMU
- 1D
- -13.83%
- 1M
- -28.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUST vs. CRMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 30.95% |
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | -64.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUST and CRMU is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUST vs. CRMU — Risk / Return Rank
DUST
CRMU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUST vs. CRMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares (DUST) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUST vs. CRMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CRMU's maximum drawdown of -73.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUST and CRMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -73.81% | -26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -64.46% | -35.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -46.63% | -36.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.24% | — | — |
Volatility
DUST vs. CRMU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUST | CRMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.59% | 246.03% | -151.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.10% | 246.03% | -172.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.25% | 246.03% | -158.78% |
DUST vs. CRMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUST has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMU's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUST vs. CRMU - Dividend Comparison
DUST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, while CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUST Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bear 2X Shares | 7.95% | 12.51% | 4.99% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUST and CRMU have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUST.
DUST has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.
DUST tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (-300%), while CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUST and 0.75% for CRMU.
Find the right allocation for DUST and CRMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer