DUSL vs. NEMG
DUSL (Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUSL is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DUSL charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.
Performance
DUSL vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUSL achieves a 38.51% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -20.44% return.
DUSL
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 38.51%
- 6M
- 33.48%
- 1Y
- 65.16%
- 3Y*
- 47.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- —
NEMG
- 1D
- -7.98%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -20.44%
- 6M
- -28.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUSL vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DUSL Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares | 38.51% | 5.57% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -20.44% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUSL and NEMG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUSL vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank
DUSL
NEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUSL vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUSL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUSL vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUSL drawdown since its inception was -85.74%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSL and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUSL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.74% | -57.56% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -53.44% | +46.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -23.21% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.24% | — | — |
Volatility
DUSL vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUSL | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.67% | 102.63% | -52.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.90% | 102.63% | -49.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.63% | 102.63% | -41.00% |
DUSL vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUSL has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUSL vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
DUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUSL Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares | 8.27% | 11.39% | 6.61% | 1.28% | 0.66% | 0.07% | 0.48% | 1.01% | 1.46% | 0.57% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUSL and NEMG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for DUSL.
DUSL has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DUSL and 0.75% for NEMG.
Find the right allocation for DUSL and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer