PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUSL vs. INTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUSL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUSL achieves a 38.51% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.


DUSL

1D
-6.26%
1M
9.86%
YTD
38.51%
6M
33.48%
1Y
65.16%
3Y*
47.94%
5Y*
21.28%
10Y*

INTW

1D
-12.49%
1M
12.21%
YTD
750.22%
6M
775.58%
1Y
1,964.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DUSL and INTW is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.36

DUSL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUSL
INTW

Industrials

18.7%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Technology

0.8%
66.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

DUSL
18.7%
INTW

-

Utilities

DUSL
0.9%
INTW

-

Technology

DUSL
0.8%
INTW
66.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DUSL
0.1%
INTW

-

Basic Materials

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Communication Services

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Consumer Defensive

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Energy

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Financial Services

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Healthcare

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Real Estate

DUSL

-

INTW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUSL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSL
DUSL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DUSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUSL Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DUSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUSL Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

INTW
INTW Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUSLINTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.65

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

40.32

-38.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

91.49

-85.11

DUSL vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSL Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSL and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUSL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSL drawdown since its inception was -85.74%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSL and INTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUSLINTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.74%

-60.58%

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.68%

-49.34%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.14%

-12.49%

+5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.92%

-29.66%

+7.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.24%

21.70%

-11.46%

Volatility

DUSL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares (DUSL) is 19.06%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that DUSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUSLINTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.06%

55.81%

-36.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.50%

119.10%

-77.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.67%

150.14%

-100.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.90%

148.88%

-95.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.63%

148.88%

-87.25%

DUSL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSL has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUSL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

DUSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUSL
Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X Shares
8.27%11.39%6.61%1.28%0.66%0.07%0.48%1.01%1.46%0.57%
INTW
GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUSL and INTW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to DUSL (19.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSL dropped -85.74% vs INTW's -60.58%.

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs 65.16% for DUSL. On fees, DUSL is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, DUSL has been the lower-risk option at 19.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs 65.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUSL is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

DUSL has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for DUSL and 1.50% for INTW.

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUSL and INTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer