DUSA vs. FJUN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUSA (Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DUSA is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DUSA returned 11.19%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DUSA charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

DUSA vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUSA achieves a 8.86% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.00% return.

DUSA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 25.67%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 4.00%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 12.54%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUSA vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF	8.86%	22.57%	20.43%	34.17%	-19.57%	17.71%	24.90%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.00%	11.05%	16.38%	22.30%	-4.95%	11.47%	9.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DUSA and FJUN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2020	0.81

The correlation between DUSA and FJUN shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DUSA vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUSA	FJUN
Financial Services	25.2%	11.1%
Healthcare	18.4%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	9.9%
Communication Services	13.2%	10.6%
Energy	9.6%	3.1%
Technology	8.6%	39.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	4.5%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.7%
Industrials	2.3%	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

DUSA vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUSA

DUSA Risk / Return Rank: 67
DUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
DUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
DUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 80
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUSA vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUSA	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.23	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	3.38	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.48	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	3.05	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	17.51	-5.98

DUSA vs. FJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the FJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUSA and FJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUSA vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUSA drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUSA and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUSA	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.71%	-13.26%	-23.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.59%	-4.13%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-13.26%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-13.26%	-17.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-0.97%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-1.66%	-5.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	0.72%	+1.51%

Volatility

DUSA vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison

Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF (DUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.94%. This indicates that DUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUSA	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	0.94%	+2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.44%	4.40%	+4.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	5.66%	+7.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.63%	10.56%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.81%	10.25%	+9.56%

DUSA vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUSA has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUSA vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

DUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DUSA Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF	0.88%	0.96%	0.85%	3.38%	1.21%	1.12%	0.51%	1.12%	2.77%	0.68%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUSA and FJUN in my portfolio?

DUSA and FJUN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUSA or FJUN?

DUSA has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to FJUN (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUSA dropped -36.71% vs FJUN's -13.26%.

Which ETF is better, DUSA or FJUN?

On 5-year performance, DUSA leads with 11.19% vs 10.54% for FJUN. On fees, DUSA is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUSA or FJUN?

Over the 5-year period, DUSA has performed better with a 11.19% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUSA or FJUN?

DUSA is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUSA or FJUN?

DUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between DUSA and FJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Davis Advisers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for DUSA and 0.85% for FJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.