PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DURPX vs. HFSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DURPX achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than HFSAX's 1.16% return.


DURPX

1D
1.88%
1M
2.62%
YTD
7.69%
6M
7.89%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*

HFSAX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
1.16%
6M
2.27%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
7.69%12.81%20.49%21.85%-11.82%25.27%19.29%33.11%-5.11%17.77%
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
1.16%11.97%3.75%10.93%-9.44%9.05%38.71%10.35%-1.97%4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DURPX and HFSAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2017

0.67

The correlation between DURPX and HFSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DURPX vs. HFSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DURPX
DURPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DURPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DURPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DURPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DURPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
DURPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

HFSAX
HFSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HFSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DURPXHFSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.63

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.68

7.23

+1.45

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DURPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the HFSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DURPX and HFSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DURPX drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than HFSAX's maximum drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DURPX and HFSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DURPXHFSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-12.81%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-3.68%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-5.67%

-12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

-12.49%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.66%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-2.38%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.33%

+0.74%

Volatility

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Volatility Comparison

DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio (DURPX) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) at 1.89%. This indicates that DURPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DURPXHFSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

1.89%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

3.87%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

4.72%

+6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.94%

6.21%

+9.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

6.27%

+11.32%

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DURPX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSAX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DURPX vs. HFSAX - Dividend Comparison

DURPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than HFSAX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DURPX
DFA US High Relative Profitability Portfolio
0.98%1.05%1.20%1.49%3.65%4.12%1.34%1.36%1.69%0.77%0.00%0.00%
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
9.64%9.75%5.87%5.17%4.92%10.98%13.58%6.44%3.11%11.06%5.60%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DURPX and HFSAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DURPX has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to HFSAX (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DURPX dropped -31.02% vs HFSAX's -12.81%.

HFSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DURPX and HFSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer