DUOG vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DUOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUOG is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. DUOG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

DUOG vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF (DUOG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DUOG

• 1D: 8.30%
• 1M: 49.95%
• YTD: -55.34%
• 6M: -57.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -26.28%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUOG vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DUOG Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF	8.74%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	-12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DUOG and MUU is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026	-0.10

Return for Risk

DUOG vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long DUOL Daily ETF (DUOG) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

DUOG vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUOG drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUOG and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUOG	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-26.28%	-56.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.55%	-26.28%	-40.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.00%	-10.19%	-53.81%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUOG	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	114.22%	295.32%	-181.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.22%	295.32%	-181.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.22%	295.32%	-181.10%

DUOG vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUOG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUOG vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DUOG nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUOG and MUU in my portfolio?

DUOG and MUU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DUOG or MUU?

On fees, DUOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUOG or MUU?

DUOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUOG or MUU?

DUOG and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DUOG and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DUOG and 1.01% for MUU.