DUKH vs. LDRH
DUKH (Ocean Park High Income ETF) and LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. DUKH is actively managed, while LDRH is passively managed. Over the past year, DUKH returned 5.48% vs 6.30% for LDRH. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DUKH charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LDRH.
Performance
DUKH vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUKH achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.
DUKH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRH
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 6.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUKH vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 0.46% | 2.85% | -1.20% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 1.88% | 7.18% | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUKH and LDRH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DUKH and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DUKH vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUKH
LDRH
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
DUKH
LDRH
-
Healthcare
DUKH
LDRH
-
Technology
DUKH
LDRH
-
Basic Materials
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Communication Services
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Consumer Cyclical
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Consumer Defensive
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Energy
DUKH
-
LDRH
Financial Services
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Industrials
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Real Estate
DUKH
-
LDRH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUKH vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank
DUKH
LDRH
DUKH vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUKH | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.48 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 5.14 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 21.43 | -15.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUKH | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 2.43 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.70 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
DUKH vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUKH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKH and LDRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUKH | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -3.17% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -1.23% | -1.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.12% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -0.24% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.87% | 0.30% | +0.57% |
Volatility
DUKH vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison
Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that DUKH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUKH | LDRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 0.69% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 1.97% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 2.61% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 3.51% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 3.51% | +0.26% |
DUKH vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUKH has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUKH vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison
DUKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKH Ocean Park High Income ETF | 6.13% | 6.12% | 2.77% |
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.99% | 6.41% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUKH and LDRH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DUKH has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKH dropped -5.70% vs LDRH's -3.17%.
On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.30% vs 5.48% for DUKH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.
LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.13% for DUKH.
They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUKH and 0.35% for LDRH.
LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUKH and LDRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer