PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUKH vs. LDRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUKH vs. LDRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUKH achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than LDRH's 1.88% return.


DUKH

1D
0.12%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.78%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LDRH

1D
0.08%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.45%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUKH vs. LDRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUKH
Ocean Park High Income ETF
0.46%2.85%-1.20%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
1.88%7.18%0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between DUKH and LDRH is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.76

The correlation between DUKH and LDRH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUKH vs. LDRH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUKH
LDRH

Utilities

89.7%

-

Healthcare

13.8%

-

Technology

10.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

DUKH
89.7%
LDRH

-

Healthcare

DUKH
13.8%
LDRH

-

Technology

DUKH
10.3%
LDRH

-

Basic Materials

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Communication Services

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Consumer Cyclical

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Consumer Defensive

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Energy

DUKH

-

LDRH
100.0%

Financial Services

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Industrials

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Real Estate

DUKH

-

LDRH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUKH vs. LDRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUKH
DUKH Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DUKH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUKH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUKH Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DUKH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUKH Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRH
LDRH Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUKH vs. LDRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) and iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUKHLDRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.48

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

5.14

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

21.43

-15.10

DUKH vs. LDRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUKH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the LDRH Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUKH and LDRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUKHLDRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.43

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.70

-0.84

Drawdowns

DUKH vs. LDRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUKH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, which is greater than LDRH's maximum drawdown of -3.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUKH and LDRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUKHLDRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-3.17%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-1.23%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.12%

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-0.24%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.30%

+0.57%

Volatility

DUKH vs. LDRH - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park High Income ETF (DUKH) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) at 0.69%. This indicates that DUKH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUKHLDRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.69%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

1.97%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

2.61%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

3.51%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

3.51%

+0.26%

DUKH vs. LDRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUKH has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LDRH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUKH vs. LDRH - Dividend Comparison

DUKH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, less than LDRH's 6.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DUKH
Ocean Park High Income ETF
6.13%6.12%2.77%
LDRH
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF
6.99%6.41%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUKH and LDRH have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUKH has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to LDRH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUKH dropped -5.70% vs LDRH's -3.17%.

On 1-year performance, LDRH leads with 6.30% vs 5.48% for DUKH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRH has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DUKH.

LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.99%, compared with 6.13% for DUKH.

They also come from different issuers: Ocean Park and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DUKH and 0.35% for LDRH.

LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUKH and LDRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer