PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUHP vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUHP vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUHP achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.


DUHP

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.52%
6M
7.88%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
10Y*

SBIT

1D
5.38%
1M
1.44%
6M
58.27%
YTD
44.00%
1Y
124.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUHP vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
9.87%13.77%8.43%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
44.00%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DUHP and SBIT is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUHP vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUHP vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DUHPSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.60

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

5.92

+2.04

DUHP vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUHP and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DUHP vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUHP drawdown since its inception was -20.05%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUHP and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUHPSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.05%

-91.35%

+71.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-47.94%

+38.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-77.15%

+76.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.96%

-68.83%

+64.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

21.04%

-18.96%

Volatility

DUHP vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is 3.90%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that DUHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUHPSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

22.98%

-19.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

68.89%

-59.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

88.51%

-76.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

96.89%

-80.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

96.89%

-80.64%

DUHP vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUHP has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DUHP vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

DUHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.92%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.97%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUHP and SBIT have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to DUHP (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUHP dropped -20.05% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 16.55% for DUHP. On fees, DUHP is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, DUHP has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUHP is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.92% for DUHP.

DUHP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DUHP and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUHP and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer