PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DUG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DUG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -44.70% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DUG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -32.42%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


DUG

1D
-2.67%
1M
1.02%
YTD
-44.70%
6M
-42.64%
1Y
-53.44%
3Y*
-28.46%
5Y*
-38.28%
10Y*
-32.42%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DUG
ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas
-44.70%-18.63%-6.13%-2.28%-72.98%-68.12%-24.59%-23.47%36.14%-1.09%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and TQQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

-0.40

The correlation between DUG and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DUG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DUG
TQQQ

Financial Services

35.8%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

DUG
35.8%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

DUG

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

DUG

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DUG

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

DUG

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

DUG

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

DUG

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

DUG

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

DUG

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

DUG

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

DUG

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DUG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG
DUG Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DUGTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.31

2.92

-4.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.28

3.09

-5.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.40

-0.63

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

3.75

-4.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.60

12.27

-13.87

DUG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DUGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.31

2.92

-4.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

0.43

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.55

0.69

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

0.74

-1.25

Drawdowns

DUG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DUGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.92%

-81.66%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.89%

-36.97%

-22.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.64%

-58.04%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.03%

-81.66%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.46%

-81.66%

-17.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-0.76%

-99.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-18.52%

-70.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.39%

11.28%

+22.11%

Volatility

DUG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 16.20% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 13.29%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DUGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.20%

13.29%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.96%

36.04%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.91%

47.60%

-6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.59%

66.53%

-14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.81%

65.96%

-7.15%

DUG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DUG and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

DUG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DUG
ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas
4.99%3.21%5.66%4.16%0.28%0.00%0.10%0.56%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DUG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUG has higher volatility (16.20%) compared to TQQQ (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs -32.42% for DUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs -32.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DUG and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

DUG tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DUG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer