DUG vs. TQQQ
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - DUG tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DUG returned -32.74%/yr vs 39.46%/yr for TQQQ. Their -0.39 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DUG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -47.25% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DUG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -32.74%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 39.46% annualized return.
DUG
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -20.41%
- 6M
- -30.77%
- YTD
- -47.25%
- 1Y
- -52.73%
- 3Y*
- -25.03%
- 5Y*
- -40.83%
- 10Y*
- -32.74%
- ALL TIME*
- -30.09%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -11.90%
- 6M
- 20.14%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 1Y
- 56.87%
- 3Y*
- 43.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 39.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33M | $1.11M | $2.13M | |
| $4.37B | $4.57B | $5.33B |
DUG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -47.25% | -18.63% | -6.13% | -2.28% | -72.98% | -68.12% | -24.59% | -23.47% | 36.14% | -1.09% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 23.06% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and TQQQ is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.39 |
The correlation between DUG and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DUG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DUG
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DUG
TQQQ
Basic Materials
DUG
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
DUG
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
DUG
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
DUG
-
TQQQ
Energy
DUG
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
DUG
-
TQQQ
Industrials
DUG
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
DUG
-
TQQQ
Technology
DUG
-
TQQQ
Utilities
DUG
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
TQQQ
DUG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.29 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 3.60 | -5.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -81.66% | -18.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.00% | -36.97% | -20.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.94% | -58.04% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | -81.66% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | -81.66% | -17.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -25.74% | -74.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -18.49% | -70.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.55% | 13.24% | +22.31% |
Volatility
DUG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) is 12.01%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.41%. This indicates that DUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 20.41% | -8.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.36% | 47.79% | -14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.16% | 57.62% | -15.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.13% | 68.04% | -16.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.79% | 66.57% | -7.78% |
DUG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DUG and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DUG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TQQQ's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.54% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.58% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.41%) compared to DUG (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 39.46% vs -32.74% for DUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DUG has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 39.46% return vs -32.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DUG and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.58% for TQQQ.
DUG tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUG and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer