DUG vs. RTXG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while RTXG is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RTXG.

Performance

DUG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -44.70% return, which is significantly lower than RTXG's -16.61% return.

DUG

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: -44.70%
• 6M: -42.64%
• 1Y: -53.44%
• 3Y*: -28.46%
• 5Y*: -38.28%
• 10Y*: -32.42%

RTXG

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: -16.61%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-44.70%	-15.97%
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	-16.61%	60.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and RTXG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

DUG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 1
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DUG	RTXG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.28	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DUG	RTXG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.51	0.72	-1.23

Drawdowns

DUG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and RTXG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	RTXG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-37.49%	-62.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.92%	-36.25%	-63.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.97%	-8.66%	-80.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DUG	RTXG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.20%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.91%	48.66%	-7.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.59%	48.66%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.81%	48.66%	+10.15%

DUG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DUG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than RTXG's 7.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.99%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF	7.63%	6.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and RTXG in my portfolio?

DUG and RTXG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DUG or RTXG?

On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or RTXG?

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or RTXG?

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 4.99% for DUG.

What is the main difference between DUG and RTXG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.75% for RTXG.