DUG vs. NVDG
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. DUG is passively managed, while NVDG is actively managed. Over the past year, DUG returned -53.44% vs 83.14% for NVDG. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.
Performance
DUG vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -44.70% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 18.93% return.
DUG
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -44.70%
- 6M
- -42.64%
- 1Y
- -53.44%
- 3Y*
- -28.46%
- 5Y*
- -38.28%
- 10Y*
- -32.42%
NVDG
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- 14.07%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 26.05%
- 1Y
- 83.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUG vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -44.70% | -18.63% | 6.73% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.93% | 32.45% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and NVDG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024 | -0.04 |
The correlation between DUG and NVDG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
NVDG
DUG vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DUG | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.22 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.96 | -2.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | 4.44 | -6.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DUG | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.31 | 1.24 | -2.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | 0.40 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
DUG vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and NVDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -66.19% | -33.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.89% | -42.72% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.92% | -18.34% | -81.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.97% | -23.07% | -65.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.39% | 18.77% | +14.62% |
Volatility
DUG vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) is 16.20%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that DUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | NVDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.20% | 25.14% | -8.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.96% | 50.15% | -17.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.91% | 67.81% | -26.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.59% | 90.72% | -39.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.81% | 90.72% | -31.91% |
DUG vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUG vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than NVDG's 9.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.99% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% |
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF | 9.93% | 11.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and NVDG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to DUG (16.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs NVDG's -66.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs -53.44% for DUG. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DUG has been the lower-risk option at 16.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs -53.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.
NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 4.99% for DUG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.75% for NVDG.
NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DUG and NVDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer