DUG vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DUG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while EIPX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. DUG is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DUG returned -26.05%/yr vs 20.84%/yr for EIPX. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

DUG vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DUG achieves a -35.95% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 19.71% return.

DUG

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: 18.26%
• YTD: -35.95%
• 6M: -37.15%
• 1Y: -38.97%
• 3Y*: -26.05%
• 5Y*: -36.45%
• 10Y*: -31.27%

EIPX

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -4.15%
• YTD: 19.71%
• 6M: 20.38%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 20.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DUG vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	-35.95%	-18.63%	-6.13%	-2.28%	-0.53%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	19.71%	11.44%	19.11%	10.74%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DUG and EIPX is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	-0.85

The correlation between DUG and EIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

DUG vs. EIPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DUG	EIPX
Financial Services	33.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	68.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	4.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	26.4%

Return for Risk

DUG vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DUG

DUG Risk / Return Rank: 2
DUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DUG vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DUG	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.94	2.23	-3.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	3.18	-4.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.37	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	4.79	-5.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	14.89	-16.12

DUG vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DUG Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the EIPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DUG and EIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DUG vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DUG	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-15.43%	-84.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.00%	-5.17%	-51.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.64%	-15.43%	-53.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.90%	-4.38%	-95.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.98%	-2.28%	-86.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.68%	1.67%	+30.01%

Volatility

DUG vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) has a higher volatility of 13.99% compared to FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) at 3.41%. This indicates that DUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DUG	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.99%	3.41%	+10.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.63%	8.42%	+25.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.89%	11.15%	+30.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.52%	15.02%	+36.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.88%	15.02%	+43.86%

DUG vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DUG and EIPX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

DUG vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than EIPX's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas	4.31%	3.21%	5.66%	4.16%	0.28%	0.00%	0.10%	0.56%	0.29%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.73%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DUG and EIPX in my portfolio?

DUG and EIPX have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DUG or EIPX?

DUG has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to EIPX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DUG dropped -99.92% vs EIPX's -15.43%.

Which ETF is better, DUG or EIPX?

On 3-year performance, EIPX leads with 20.84% vs -26.05% for DUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DUG or EIPX?

Over the 3-year period, EIPX has performed better with a 20.84% return vs -26.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DUG or EIPX?

DUG and EIPX have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DUG or EIPX?

DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 2.73% for EIPX.

What is the main difference between DUG and EIPX?

DUG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EIPX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.