DUG vs. ALBG
DUG (ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas) and ALBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DUG tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%) while ALBG tracks the Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. DUG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ALBG.
Performance
DUG vs. ALBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DUG
- 1D
- -5.99%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- -37.26%
- YTD
- -41.97%
- 1Y
- -43.51%
- 3Y*
- -25.98%
- 5Y*
- -39.19%
- 10Y*
- -31.31%
ALBG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -46.99%
- 6M
- -58.75%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DUG vs. ALBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | -37.26% |
ALBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF | -58.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DUG and ALBG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DUG vs. ALBG — Risk / Return Rank
DUG
ALBG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUG vs. ALBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas (DUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF (ALBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DUG | ALBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DUG vs. ALBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DUG drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than ALBG's maximum drawdown of -68.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DUG and ALBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DUG | ALBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -68.98% | -30.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -68.98% | -30.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.01% | -30.62% | -58.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.36% | — | — |
Volatility
DUG vs. ALBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DUG | ALBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.14% | 120.72% | -78.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.48% | 120.72% | -69.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.82% | 120.72% | -61.90% |
DUG vs. ALBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DUG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ALBG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DUG vs. ALBG - Dividend Comparison
DUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while ALBG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DUG ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas | 4.13% | 3.21% | 5.66% | 4.16% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.56% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DUG and ALBG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ALBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DUG.
DUG has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.00% for ALBG.
DUG tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Oil & Gas -IND (-200%), while ALBG tracks Albemarle Corporation (ALB). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DUG and 0.75% for ALBG.
Find the right allocation for DUG and ALBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer