ALBG vs. UECG
ALBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF) and UECG (Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - ALBG tracks the Albemarle Corporation (ALB) while UECG tracks the Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC). Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ALBG vs. UECG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ALBG
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- -29.82%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UECG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALBG vs. UECG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ALBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF | -17.26% |
UECG Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF | -41.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALBG and UECG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALBG vs. UECG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ALB Daily ETF (ALBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long UEC Daily ETF (UECG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALBG | UECG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -0.55 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
ALBG vs. UECG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALBG drawdown since its inception was -43.95%, smaller than the maximum UECG drawdown of -56.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBG and UECG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALBG | UECG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -56.21% | +12.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.95% | -41.37% | -2.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.08% | -30.40% | +6.32% |
Volatility
ALBG vs. UECG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALBG | UECG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 123.19% | 150.56% | -27.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 123.19% | 150.56% | -27.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 123.19% | 150.56% | -27.37% |
ALBG vs. UECG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ALBG and UECG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ALBG vs. UECG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALBG nor UECG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALBG and UECG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ALBG and UECG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ALBG and UECG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ALBG tracks Albemarle Corporation (ALB), while UECG tracks Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC).
Find the right allocation for ALBG and UECG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer