PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTSGX vs. WFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTSGX achieves a 16.02% return, which is significantly higher than WFIVX's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DTSGX has underperformed WFIVX with an annualized return of 8.57%, while WFIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.


DTSGX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.50%
6M
11.86%
YTD
16.02%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
8.57%
ALL TIME*
8.12%

WFIVX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.23%
6M
7.65%
YTD
9.93%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
13.56%
ALL TIME*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
16.02%7.91%4.24%17.91%-31.39%12.56%28.93%27.91%-7.98%13.87%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
9.93%16.31%22.59%24.97%-18.97%25.51%19.90%29.74%-5.66%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DTSGX and WFIVX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 1999

0.88

The correlation between DTSGX and WFIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTSGX vs. WFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTSGX
DTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIVX
WFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
WFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTSGXWFIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

2.11

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

9.06

-2.35

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the WFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTSGX and WFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, roughly equal to the maximum WFIVX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSGX and WFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-55.43%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-8.89%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

-19.36%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.62%

-24.93%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-34.62%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-1.46%

-5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-11.58%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.07%

+1.85%

Volatility

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) at 3.46%. This indicates that DTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.34%

3.46%

+2.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.76%

10.24%

+7.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.29%

13.07%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.00%

17.24%

+6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

18.19%

+5.23%

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTSGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WFIVX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Dividend Comparison

DTSGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%25.61%38.28%12.13%2.46%6.52%10.69%11.80%5.94%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
8.16%8.97%2.79%3.33%5.18%7.25%9.16%5.06%5.97%8.83%2.06%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTSGX and WFIVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTSGX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to WFIVX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSGX dropped -56.83% vs WFIVX's -55.43%.

WFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTSGX and WFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer