PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTSGX vs. WFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTSGX achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than WFIVX's 11.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DTSGX has underperformed WFIVX with an annualized return of 9.15%, while WFIVX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


DTSGX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.19%
YTD
17.39%
6M
17.13%
1Y
34.19%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
9.15%

WFIVX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.94%
YTD
11.30%
6M
11.56%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
17.39%7.91%4.24%17.91%-31.39%12.56%28.93%27.91%-7.98%13.87%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
11.30%16.31%22.59%24.97%-18.97%25.51%19.90%29.74%-5.66%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between DTSGX and WFIVX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1999

0.88

The correlation between DTSGX and WFIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTSGX vs. WFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTSGX
DTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIVX
WFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.41

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

3.29

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.26

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.81

15.02

-5.21

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the WFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTSGX and WFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.41

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.73

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.78

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.40

-0.04

Drawdowns

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, roughly equal to the maximum WFIVX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSGX and WFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-55.43%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-8.89%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

-19.36%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.62%

-24.93%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

-34.62%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

0.00%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-11.64%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.93%

+1.61%

Volatility

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) at 2.89%. This indicates that DTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTSGXWFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

2.89%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

9.13%

+6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.78%

12.12%

+8.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

17.13%

+6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

18.19%

+5.16%

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTSGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than WFIVX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTSGX vs. WFIVX - Dividend Comparison

DTSGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WFIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%25.61%38.28%12.13%2.46%6.52%10.69%11.80%5.94%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
8.06%8.97%2.79%3.33%5.18%7.25%9.16%5.06%5.97%8.83%2.06%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTSGX and WFIVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTSGX has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to WFIVX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSGX dropped -56.83% vs WFIVX's -55.43%.

WFIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTSGX and WFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer