DTSGX vs. CMCIX
DTSGX (Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio) and CMCIX (Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past year, DTSGX returned 34.19% vs 0.07% for CMCIX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DTSGX charges 1.35%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for CMCIX.
Performance
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTSGX achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.
DTSGX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 34.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.20%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
CMCIX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 0.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DTSGX Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio | 17.39% | 7.91% | 4.24% | 9.20% |
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 1.72% | -5.28% | 10.46% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTSGX and CMCIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DTSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank
DTSGX
CMCIX
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | -0.02 | +1.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.40 | 0.08 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.01 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | -0.04 | +2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | -0.09 | +9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | -0.02 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSGX and CMCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.83% | -21.50% | -35.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.28% | -11.68% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -10.79% | +9.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -6.44% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 4.98% | -1.44% |
Volatility
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that DTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTSGX | CMCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.89% | +2.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.00% | 10.55% | +5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 15.16% | +5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 16.55% | +7.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 16.55% | +6.80% |
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTSGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison
DTSGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I | 4.18% | 4.25% | 7.13% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTSGX Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.61% | 38.28% | 12.13% | 2.46% | 6.52% | 10.69% | 11.80% | 5.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTSGX has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSGX dropped -56.83% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.
DTSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DTSGX and CMCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer