PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTSGX vs. CMCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTSGX achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than CMCIX's 1.72% return.


DTSGX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.19%
YTD
17.39%
6M
17.13%
1Y
34.19%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*
9.15%

CMCIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.56%
1Y
0.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
17.39%7.91%4.24%9.20%
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
1.72%-5.28%10.46%7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DTSGX and CMCIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.82

The correlation between DTSGX and CMCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTSGX vs. CMCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTSGX
DTSGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DTSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DTSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCIX
CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) and Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTSGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

-0.02

+1.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

0.08

+2.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.01

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

-0.04

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.81

-0.09

+9.90

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CMCIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTSGX and CMCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTSGXCMCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

-0.02

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.32

+0.04

Drawdowns

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.83%, which is greater than CMCIX's maximum drawdown of -21.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTSGX and CMCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTSGXCMCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.83%

-21.50%

-35.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.28%

-11.68%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-10.79%

+9.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-6.44%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

4.98%

-1.44%

Volatility

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Volatility Comparison

Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio (DTSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) at 3.89%. This indicates that DTSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTSGXCMCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

3.89%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

10.55%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.78%

15.16%

+5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.76%

16.55%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

16.55%

+6.80%

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTSGX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CMCIX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTSGX vs. CMCIX - Dividend Comparison

DTSGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCIX
Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I
4.18%4.25%7.13%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DTSGX
Wilshire Small Company Growth Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%25.61%38.28%12.13%2.46%6.52%10.69%11.80%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTSGX and CMCIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTSGX has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to CMCIX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTSGX dropped -56.83% vs CMCIX's -21.50%.

DTSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTSGX and CMCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer