DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L
DTRE.L (First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist) and CIBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - DTRE.L is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while CIBR.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DTRE.L returned 1.50%/yr vs 22.15%/yr for CIBR.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DTRE.L is traded in GBp, while CIBR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CIBR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTRE.L achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR.L's 25.53% return.
DTRE.L
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- 1Y
- 9.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR.L
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 29.75%
- YTD
- 25.53%
- 6M
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.81%
- 10Y*
- —
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTRE.L First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist | 6.86% | 0.17% | -9.49% | 7.19% | -18.73% |
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 25.53% | -0.09% | 21.03% | 33.79% | -21.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTRE.L and CIBR.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022 | 0.35 |
The correlation between DTRE.L and CIBR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DTRE.L
CIBR.L
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
DTRE.L
CIBR.L
-
Basic Materials
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Communication Services
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
Consumer Cyclical
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Energy
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Financial Services
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Healthcare
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Industrials
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
Technology
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
Utilities
DTRE.L
-
CIBR.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L — Risk / Return Rank
DTRE.L
CIBR.L
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L) and First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTRE.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | 2.11 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTRE.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.88 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | 0.69 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTRE.L drawdown since its inception was -31.20%, which is greater than CIBR.L's maximum drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTRE.L and CIBR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTRE.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.20% | -26.65% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -24.29% | +16.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -25.48% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.18% | -3.05% | -15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -9.33% | -10.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 10.68% | -7.89% |
Volatility
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L) is 4.08%, while First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (CIBR.L) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that DTRE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTRE.L | CIBR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 12.21% | -8.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 22.57% | -13.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 25.58% | -13.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 23.70% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 23.78% | -7.96% |
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DTRE.L and CIBR.L have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
DTRE.L vs. CIBR.L - Dividend Comparison
DTRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while CIBR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DTRE.L First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist | 2.61% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 2.20% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTRE.L and CIBR.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTRE.L and CIBR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
DTRE.L is categorized as REIT, while CIBR.L is Technology Equities. DTRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while CIBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.
Find the right allocation for DTRE.L and CIBR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer