DTLA.L vs. RSBT
DTLA.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTLA.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 20+ Year Index, while RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked. DTLA.L is passively managed, while RSBT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DTLA.L returned -1.20%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for RSBT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DTLA.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RSBT.
Performance
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTLA.L achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 6.42% return.
DTLA.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -1.20%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
RSBT
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 6.42%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.86% | 4.49% | -6.90% | -3.30% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 6.42% | 10.31% | -2.90% | -11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DTLA.L and RSBT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DTLA.L vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank
DTLA.L
RSBT
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DTLA.L | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 3.53 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 9.11 | -7.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTLA.L drawdown since its inception was -48.41%, which is greater than RSBT's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTLA.L and RSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTLA.L | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.41% | -23.60% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -6.33% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.57% | -18.98% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.40% | -3.83% | -36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.06% | -12.55% | -11.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.45% | +0.55% |
Volatility
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DTLA.L) is 3.33%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that DTLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DTLA.L | RSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 5.71% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 11.07% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 14.74% | -4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 13.88% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 13.88% | +0.91% |
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTLA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
DTLA.L vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison
DTLA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DTLA.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF | 3.01% | 3.20% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DTLA.L and RSBT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTLA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTLA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.
DTLA.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while RSBT is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for DTLA.L and 0.97% for RSBT.
Find the right allocation for DTLA.L and RSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer