PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTEC vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTEC vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.78% return.


DTEC

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.41%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
-6.02%
1Y
-0.73%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.40%
1M
3.71%
YTD
9.78%
6M
9.63%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTEC vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
-4.12%7.21%9.89%25.03%-31.29%4.89%44.12%35.44%-4.96%0.04%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
9.78%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%3.37%-1.49%-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DTEC and YCS is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.01

The correlation between DTEC and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTEC vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTEC
DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTEC vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DTECYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.35

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

3.79

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

11.86

-11.94

DTEC vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTEC and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DTEC vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTECYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.00%

-49.56%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

-8.30%

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-23.05%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.00%

-27.32%

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.68%

0.00%

-11.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-19.88%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.95%

2.65%

+6.30%

Volatility

DTEC vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.22%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTECYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

2.22%

+5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.93%

12.19%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

16.96%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.16%

21.10%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

18.96%

+3.93%

DTEC vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTEC vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
0.04%0.04%0.45%0.27%0.02%0.26%0.37%0.43%0.33%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTEC and YCS have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTEC has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to YCS (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.50% vs -0.42% for DTEC. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.50% return vs -0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

DTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: SS&C and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTEC and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer